Committed Recruits ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad


Committed Recruits Update Thread

3,465 Posts
130 Users
771 Reactions
173.2 K Views
MNBassman
(@davey-j)
Wooger Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 128
Rep Pts: 288
 

Is Dean Blais available? 😆

Formerly known as davey j.


   
ReplyQuote
GopherPete
(@gopherpete)
Micheletti Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 244
Rep Pts: 609
 

Some of you get your panties so bunched up when others imply anything that you consider negative about the team/program/coaches. I'm not sold on Bob, who cares. If you like him as a coach then that's great. Don't get so worked up. And just because I'm ready to move on from him doesn't mean it's my duty to find a replacement. We have people who get paid big bucks to do that. 


   
ReplyQuote
Boosker
(@boosker14)
Wooger Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 75
Rep Pts: 275
 

Posted by: @gopherpete

it caused me to doubt whether or not Bob could win the big one.

If you make it to the Frozen Four, the most likely answer is you can win the big one with said coach. 

All Snuggy had to do was bury it on a 2 on 1 and we're not even talking about this... 


   
ReplyQuote
MNBassman
(@davey-j)
Wooger Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 128
Rep Pts: 288
 

Find another thread to talk about this.

Formerly known as davey j.


   
Hammy, Gopher Fan 26, MNNavy and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
Walker? I Barely Know Her
(@walker-barely-know-her)
Lucia Level
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 46
Rep Pts: 136
 

Posted by: @steve-mn

Posted by: @jdpuck04

@gopherpete - for...who? Is there someone better or that is on the U's radar for the heir apparent? If we are going to say replace Bob - there has to be a better alternative.

One thousand percent this.

If you're disappointed with Bob the last year or two, ok, I can sort of understand that (even though I don't agree, it's a position I can understand).  But, before you say we need to get rid of him you need to come up with a name for a replacement that is:

A - at least as good as Bob has been

B- someone that's actually available and not some random pipe dream that we could get them

I'd say that's a difficult ask right now.  The handful of coaches that I think are truly on the same level as Bob are all in great positions and I can't really see them moving any time soon.  Yeah B1G money speaks volumes, but, can we really get Nightingale away from MSU (already with B1G money)?  Or Carle away from Denver?  Carle is probably more likely, but even there, he's making the same kind of money as Motzko, in an environment that's way less stressful.  Pandalfo?  He's a BU guy from day 1 and also making roughly the same already.  After that, what... Pecknold?  After 31 years at QU?  Hastings?  Let's see if he can actually get a true winning team built with top-end talent rather than a team that's 3/4s 24 or 25 year old defensive lockdown style (and a goalie that isn't on steroids).

If someone has a reasonable candidate, let's have a conversation, but, until I see a name of someone that we could realistically see moving here, let's drop the "Bob has to go" when he's been here for 7 years, made the tournament all but the first two, and the frozen 4 twice in that span.

 

replacing Bob with Nightingale would be absurd by every single measure. Bob just flipped one of MSU’s top recruits. The only other coach with a somewhat comparable track record as to recruiting elite US-NTDP guys is Greg Brown for BC, and Brown didn’t even recruit the Leonard-Smith-Perreault trio. [I do not respect Naurato as a coach and he’s definitely not a main factor  in Michigan getting all those high-end commits. Or maybe he is- but in all the worst ways.]

imagine if MSU had fired Nightingale as a knee jerk response after we ran up that 5-0-0 season record vs. them with 32-6 goals for/against (5-0,6-2,8-0,6-3,5-1)

 


   
ReplyQuote
Chill Kessel
(@chill-kessel)
Leopold Level
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 855
Rep Pts: 1635
 

Posted by: @jdpuck04

@gopherpete - for...who? Is there someone better or that is on the U's radar for the heir apparent? If we are going to say replace Bob - there has to be a better alternative.

 

Dean Blais

 


   
ReplyQuote
maroon and gold
(@maroon_and_gold)
Mariucci Level
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3276
Rep Pts: 8461
 

Getting back to committed recruits…

 

I feel like we’re pretty stuffed at forward for the next couple seasons:

2026-27 (assuming Ludtke signing)

Hendrickson-Clark-Mooney

Townsend-Pahlsson-Ziemer

Moore-Moe-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Pritchard

Extras: Reid, Harris

 

2027-28

Hendrickson-Pahlsson-Mooney

Townsend-Moe-Ziemer

Moore-Cullen-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Katz

Extras: Cullen, Reid, Harris

 

Edit: I totally forgot Pritchard existed for 2027-28, which only further proves my point that we’re pretty stuffed at forward.

 

Even Conboy and/or Jarvis could be ready for college by 27-28 with two good years in the USHL. I guess they’re banking on Ziemer not staying 4 years? Maybe even Mooney leaving after 2? They’re gonna have to push out some current recruits if they wanna make room for Fitzhenry or Schneider.


   
ReplyQuote
maroon and gold
(@maroon_and_gold)
Mariucci Level
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3276
Rep Pts: 8461
 

Posted by: @maroon_and_gold

Getting back to committed recruits…

 

I feel like we’re pretty stuffed at forward for the next couple seasons:

2026-27 (assuming Ludtke signing)

Hendrickson-Clark-Mooney

Townsend-Pahlsson-Ziemer

Moore-Moe-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Pritchard

Extras: Reid, Harris

 

2027-28

Hendrickson-Pahlsson-Mooney

Townsend-Moe-Ziemer

Moore-Cullen-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Katz

Extras: Cullen, Reid, Harris

 

Even Conboy and/or Jarvis could be ready for college by 27-28 with two good years in the USHL. I guess they’re banking on Ziemer not staying 4 years? Maybe even Mooney leaving after 2? They’re gonna have to push out some current recruits if they wanna make room for Fitzhenry or Schneider.

This is also assuming Brooks and Wyatt Cullen don’t come in til 2027-28 which is very much up in the air. Brooks alone I feel won’t be ready til 27-28 but Wyatt may feel he’s ready by next season. A year of juniors after his u18 year like Hendy and Kwaz wouldn’t hurt him I feel, especially since he’s pretty young for his age group. 

Anyone know if Wyatt is still 5’8 like elite prospects claims? I remember reading somewhere that he had a growth spurt this season and is now 5’10-5’11 range.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 4546
Post on old board: 12555
 

I came here to see who committed today and so far nothing.

 

VERY disappointed!

 


   
ReplyQuote
BlueBandit24
(@bluebandit24)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 829
Rep Pts: 2029
 

It is possible the staff's belief is Fitzhenry and Schneider are going elsewhere and they pivoted to other options. You can also add them to the pipeline and get creative down the line. You do not want to overrecruit to an extreme degree but you also have to be prepared for general attrition if it hits hard. Stuffed forward pipeline but it looks like a healthy one.


   
ReplyQuote
Iceburg
(@iceburg)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 1716
Rep Pts: 3115
Post on old board: 7833
 

Gunnar Conboy story
https://www.apx-hockey.com/news-detail-23


   
ReplyQuote
upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2362
Rep Pts: 5807
 

Posted by: @maroon_and_gold

Getting back to committed recruits…

 

I feel like we’re pretty stuffed at forward for the next couple seasons:

2026-27 (assuming Ludtke signing)

Hendrickson-Clark-Mooney

Townsend-Pahlsson-Ziemer

Moore-Moe-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Pritchard

Extras: Reid, Harris

 

2027-28

Hendrickson-Pahlsson-Mooney

Townsend-Moe-Ziemer

Moore-Cullen-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Katz

Extras: Cullen, Reid, Harris

 

Edit: I totally forgot Pritchard existed for 2027-28, which only further proves my point that we’re pretty stuffed at forward.

 

Even Conboy and/or Jarvis could be ready for college by 27-28 with two good years in the USHL. I guess they’re banking on Ziemer not staying 4 years? Maybe even Mooney leaving after 2? They’re gonna have to push out some current recruits if they wanna make room for Fitzhenry or Schneider.

Reid, Harris, and Nevers have not shown anything to this point that they would be considered "high end" recruits. Katz we'll see. You absolutely push them if you have better options and I think all kids know this at this point. Fitzhenry and Schneider are absolute takes and you figure it out. We are full in the bottom 6, not the top as it stands right now and you want every chance to hit on those types of players, even if it costs 1-2 extra skaters as you can always find a guy like Harris to bring in and you never know if every one of these guys is going to stick every year (we've had a decent number of bottom 6 guys transfer out over the last few years). 

 


   
ReplyQuote



g-manpuck
(@g-manpuck)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1084
Rep Pts: 2516
Post on old board: 6782
 

Posted by: @bertogliat

I came here to see who committed today and so far nothing.

 

VERY disappointed!

 


Losing Oh No GIF by Star Now

 

I am the official Iowa Hawkeye football fan of GPL!


   
ReplyQuote
maroon and gold
(@maroon_and_gold)
Mariucci Level
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 3276
Rep Pts: 8461
 

Posted by: @upnorthkid

Posted by: @maroon_and_gold

Getting back to committed recruits…

 

I feel like we’re pretty stuffed at forward for the next couple seasons:

2026-27 (assuming Ludtke signing)

Hendrickson-Clark-Mooney

Townsend-Pahlsson-Ziemer

Moore-Moe-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Pritchard

Extras: Reid, Harris

 

2027-28

Hendrickson-Pahlsson-Mooney

Townsend-Moe-Ziemer

Moore-Cullen-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Katz

Extras: Cullen, Reid, Harris

 

Edit: I totally forgot Pritchard existed for 2027-28, which only further proves my point that we’re pretty stuffed at forward.

 

Even Conboy and/or Jarvis could be ready for college by 27-28 with two good years in the USHL. I guess they’re banking on Ziemer not staying 4 years? Maybe even Mooney leaving after 2? They’re gonna have to push out some current recruits if they wanna make room for Fitzhenry or Schneider.

Reid, Harris, and Nevers have not shown anything to this point that they would be considered "high end" recruits. Katz we'll see. You absolutely push them if you have better options and I think all kids know this at this point. Fitzhenry and Schneider are absolute takes and you figure it out. We are full in the bottom 6, not the top as it stands right now and you want every chance to hit on those types of players, even if it costs 1-2 extra skaters as you can always find a guy like Harris to bring in and you never know if every one of these guys is going to stick every year (we've had a decent number of bottom 6 guys transfer out over the last few years). 

 

Yeah Harris and Reid are 100% discardable but that doesn’t create any actual room in the lineup as they’re already extra skaters as it stands. I guess push Nevers and/or Katz to an extra skater? Idk

 


   
ReplyQuote
upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2362
Rep Pts: 5807
 

Posted by: @maroon_and_gold

Posted by: @upnorthkid

Posted by: @maroon_and_gold

Getting back to committed recruits…

 

I feel like we’re pretty stuffed at forward for the next couple seasons:

2026-27 (assuming Ludtke signing)

Hendrickson-Clark-Mooney

Townsend-Pahlsson-Ziemer

Moore-Moe-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Pritchard

Extras: Reid, Harris

 

2027-28

Hendrickson-Pahlsson-Mooney

Townsend-Moe-Ziemer

Moore-Cullen-Kvasnicka

Falloon-Nevers-Katz

Extras: Cullen, Reid, Harris

 

Edit: I totally forgot Pritchard existed for 2027-28, which only further proves my point that we’re pretty stuffed at forward.

 

Even Conboy and/or Jarvis could be ready for college by 27-28 with two good years in the USHL. I guess they’re banking on Ziemer not staying 4 years? Maybe even Mooney leaving after 2? They’re gonna have to push out some current recruits if they wanna make room for Fitzhenry or Schneider.

Reid, Harris, and Nevers have not shown anything to this point that they would be considered "high end" recruits. Katz we'll see. You absolutely push them if you have better options and I think all kids know this at this point. Fitzhenry and Schneider are absolute takes and you figure it out. We are full in the bottom 6, not the top as it stands right now and you want every chance to hit on those types of players, even if it costs 1-2 extra skaters as you can always find a guy like Harris to bring in and you never know if every one of these guys is going to stick every year (we've had a decent number of bottom 6 guys transfer out over the last few years). 

 

Yeah Harris and Reid are 100% discardable but that doesn’t create any actual room in the lineup as they’re already extra skaters as it stands. I guess push Nevers and/or Katz to an extra skater? Idk

 

correct. and that competition in the bottom 6 would absolutely be a good thing, both from a pushing each other and an avoiding situations like last year where we had Michel skating and/or Begley skating forward shifts

 


   
ReplyQuote
Page 70 / 70

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad