Vikings 2024-25 sea...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad


Vikings 2024-25 season

1,101 Posts
40 Users
213 Reactions
18.8 K Views
bearpaw28
(@bearpaw28)
Broten Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1600
Rep Pts: 2705
Post on old board: 6912
 

In retrospect…from a CAP & team development standpoint, as painful as those 2 losses were, the Vikings GOAL is to END the SB Homeboy drought!  And while Sam had a great regular season (up to the Lions game) & Rams playoff game…he simply isn’t that guy. So we gotta hope JJ McCarthy can evolve into that guy & spend our CAP 💵 accordingly! SKOL


   
ReplyQuote
team2tank
(@team2tank)
Wooger Level
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 229
Rep Pts: 414
 

Posted by: @handyman

If JJ is ready to go there is no issue at all I just worry he wont be...we just might be resigned to the fact the team will probably struggle some if he is the starter all of next year.  I have seen enough of Vikings fans though to know they will likely turn on him when he struggles and they can be hard to win back.

The coaches are going to need to improve their play calling next year.  KOC makes weird decisions that there is no logical reason for especially in the red zone.  You can get away with some of them with an experienced QB, but a young QB coming off a full year injury and previous play being in college?  No bueno.

You see the play calling struggles on 4th down. These are usually very manageable situations 4th and 5 yds or less. Just about every Vikings 4th down play call is an adventure.

The Vikes were 29th of 32 teams in conversion on 4th down with a 41.18% conversion rate. 24 teams are at 50% or higher. The top 10 are 64% or higher and 9 of those teams were in the playoffs. The Vikes struggle big time in extending drives & calling simple high percentage plays to get the few yards they need.

I love KOC and the Vikes are lucky to have him & hopefully for a long time. But to think he is at his peak or is already a top coach & also play caller. Sorry not even close yet.

 


   
HandyNotDan reacted
ReplyQuote
Snowcool08
(@snowcool08)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 787
Rep Pts: 1832
Post on old board: 6069
 

Posted by: @team2tank

Posted by: @handyman

If JJ is ready to go there is no issue at all I just worry he wont be...we just might be resigned to the fact the team will probably struggle some if he is the starter all of next year.  I have seen enough of Vikings fans though to know they will likely turn on him when he struggles and they can be hard to win back.

The coaches are going to need to improve their play calling next year.  KOC makes weird decisions that there is no logical reason for especially in the red zone.  You can get away with some of them with an experienced QB, but a young QB coming off a full year injury and previous play being in college?  No bueno.

You see the play calling struggles on 4th down. These are usually very manageable situations 4th and 5 yds or less. Just about every Vikings 4th down play call is an adventure.

The Vikes were 29th of 32 teams in conversion on 4th down with a 41.18% conversion rate. 24 teams are at 50% or higher. The top 10 are 64% or higher and 9 of those teams were in the playoffs. The Vikes struggle big time in extending drives & calling simple high percentage plays to get the few yards they need.

I love KOC and the Vikes are lucky to have him & hopefully for a long time. But to think he is at his peak or is already a top coach & also play caller. Sorry not even close yet.

 

Part of his struggles are his unwillingness to run.  Understood his O-line hasn't been the best.  I needs to be a mindset that if they need 1 yard, they can push the other team over to get that.  Not just that they're going to out-scheme to get someone open for a pass.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2766
Rep Pts: 5505
Post on old board: 12555
 

Posted by: @snowcool08

Posted by: @team2tank

Posted by: @handyman

If JJ is ready to go there is no issue at all I just worry he wont be...we just might be resigned to the fact the team will probably struggle some if he is the starter all of next year.  I have seen enough of Vikings fans though to know they will likely turn on him when he struggles and they can be hard to win back.

The coaches are going to need to improve their play calling next year.  KOC makes weird decisions that there is no logical reason for especially in the red zone.  You can get away with some of them with an experienced QB, but a young QB coming off a full year injury and previous play being in college?  No bueno.

You see the play calling struggles on 4th down. These are usually very manageable situations 4th and 5 yds or less. Just about every Vikings 4th down play call is an adventure.

The Vikes were 29th of 32 teams in conversion on 4th down with a 41.18% conversion rate. 24 teams are at 50% or higher. The top 10 are 64% or higher and 9 of those teams were in the playoffs. The Vikes struggle big time in extending drives & calling simple high percentage plays to get the few yards they need.

I love KOC and the Vikes are lucky to have him & hopefully for a long time. But to think he is at his peak or is already a top coach & also play caller. Sorry not even close yet.

 

Part of his struggles are his unwillingness to run.  Understood his O-line hasn't been the best.  I needs to be a mindset that if they need 1 yard, they can push the other team over to get that.  Not just that they're going to out-scheme to get someone open for a pass.

 

They haven't had competent run blocking in years.  There is rarely a hole for RBs to run though.  It's almost as if they use the run to try to keep the defense honest and don't actually try to get rushing yards.

 

 


   
ReplyQuote
YoungEagle
(@youngeagle)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 919
Rep Pts: 2271
 

If JJ McCarthy is the QB we have going forward.  Protecting him with a nasty and mean offensive line should be where our coin goes this offseason.  A good running game will be crucial too.  Takes so much pressure (both figuratively and physically) off a QB's shoulders.  Treat that position like the asset it is.  

'29, '40, '74, '76, '79, '02, & '03
GPL's Resident Cabin Enthusiast & Cadets Hockey Fan


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2766
Rep Pts: 5505
Post on old board: 12555
 

Posted by: @youngeagle

If JJ McCarthy is the QB we have going forward.  Protecting him with a nasty and mean offensive line should be where our coin goes this offseason.  A good running game will be crucial too.  Takes so much pressure (both figuratively and physically) off a QB's shoulders.  Treat that position like the asset it is.  

Darrisaw and O'Neill are under contract and we shouldn't need to replace them.  I think the consensus from the little I've read is Bradberry should be replaced.  Is it just a matter of upgrading the middle of the OL?  Not that that's easy or cheap.  We essentially have 1 draft pick with which to find an impact player and the rest will be projects or depth players.

 

 

 


   
ReplyQuote
gopher6
(@gopher6)
Leopold Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1392
Rep Pts: 1885
Post on old board: 5547
Topic starter  

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

Aloha!


   
ReplyQuote
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 


   
HandyNotDan and gator reacted
ReplyQuote
Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4523
Rep Pts: 10075
Post on old board: 18942
 

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 

 

A lot of people said Cousins was terrible despite the stats.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Sunbone
(@sunbone)
Micheletti Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 177
Rep Pts: 552
Post on old board: 8761
 

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 

 

A lot of people said Cousins was terrible despite the stats.

 

I don’t remember too many people saying Cousins was terrible. It was more that he was slightly above average and way overpaid. Which I think was accurate. And as bad as Darnold played the last two weeks I think KOC should shoulder as much or more of the blame. Part of his job is to make some adjustments and to calm his QB down. He failed miserably at both. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
gator
(@gator)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 5127
Rep Pts: 8469
Post on old board: 16243
 

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The exact reason I posted my replies... I didn't see this fire from game 1 through 16.

 

Keep your stick on the ice...


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

It’s days later and I’m still asking myself why didn’t he just pull it down and take off after 3 seconds of not seeing what he wanted? He wasn’t the same player, I really thought our chances with him were solid after the Seattle game. The Detroit game imo was less on darnold and more on game plan or lack of adjustments to man coverage. Sam didn’t really have the open receivers in Detroit like he did with the rams but imo he lost his confidence after Detroit and the pressure got the best of him. Playing for a contract and first playoff game in one. Seemed like he was just trying too hard to not make a mistake instead of playing like he did early on in the season and just having fun with nothing to lose. I’m ok bringing him back but no way should we pay him what he’s gonna get offered. JJ is the franchise qb let him start the process if healthy. He’s mobile and more athletic and he’s gonna do fine with an average O line imo.


   
ReplyQuote



Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4523
Rep Pts: 10075
Post on old board: 18942
 

Posted by: @sunbone

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 

 

A lot of people said Cousins was terrible despite the stats.

 

I don’t remember too many people saying Cousins was terrible. It was more that he was slightly above average and way overpaid. Which I think was accurate. And as bad as Darnold played the last two weeks I think KOC should shoulder as much or more of the blame. Part of his job is to make some adjustments and to calm his QB down. He failed miserably at both. 

 

Tomato/tomahto on the terrible label, but the FACT is way too many fans shouldered the lack of playoff success on Cousins' shoulders and now they want to blame KOC and forgive Darnold. 

They had to move on from Cousins because of the contract he wanted don't get me wrong, but sorry Darnold just isn't the answer.  The overall negative body of work is just too damning to overlook.  This season for him was lipstick on a pig and they have McCarthy waiting in the wings. If they did not just draft him when they did then keeping Darnold makes much more sense. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

If they’re considering another contract for Sam it should be for the same reason they signed him this season before JJ got hurt. To have some experience mixed with rookie and it’s an open competition. But like I said his value is going to be a lot higher (although not necessarily just speculation). Jones can fill Darnold’s roll but it should be JJ’s job with control of his destiny. I don’t know exactly who’s looking for a Sam Darnold right now, Raiders, jets, Steelers? Let them over pay. We need to build around JJ.


   
ReplyQuote
MNNavy
(@mnnavy)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 986
Rep Pts: 1763
 

From Nick Shook at NFL.com

  • Steelers
  • Jets
  • Giants
  • Saints
  • Raiders
  • Browns
  • Colts
  • Titans

Regarding the Vikings, he says...

Alas, this feels like the most likely outcome after Darnold's disappointing finish. McCarthy is returning from a meniscus injury that cost him his rookie season, opening the door for Darnold's breakout campaign. The fashion in which it ended might tank his value enough to make a return to Minnesota possible, perhaps in the range my colleague Gregg Rosenthal proposed on NFL Daily: two years, $30 million. A $15 million-per-year contract for a plus backup is feasible financially, and the two parties have enough familiarity from the 2024 season to justify running it back. The difference, though, is Darnold would be returning as a projected backup. He's a reliable option and a nice insurance policy in the event McCarthy struggles or isn't able to get healthy enough to play. There is one concern, though: Darnold's return could create a controversial scenario like the one produced by the Nick Foles/Carson Wentz dynamic in Philadelphia following the Eagles' Super Bowl triumph over the Patriots at the end of the 2017 season. The Vikings don't need those headlines.

Tact is the ability to step on a man's toes without messing up the shine on his shoes - Harry S Truman


   
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @sunbone

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 

 

A lot of people said Cousins was terrible despite the stats.

 

I don’t remember too many people saying Cousins was terrible. It was more that he was slightly above average and way overpaid. Which I think was accurate. And as bad as Darnold played the last two weeks I think KOC should shoulder as much or more of the blame. Part of his job is to make some adjustments and to calm his QB down. He failed miserably at both. 

 

Tomato/tomahto on the terrible label, but the FACT is way too many fans shouldered the lack of playoff success on Cousins' shoulders and now they want to blame KOC and forgive Darnold. 

They had to move on from Cousins because of the contract he wanted don't get me wrong, but sorry Darnold just isn't the answer.  The overall negative body of work is just too damning to overlook.  This season for him was lipstick on a pig and they have McCarthy waiting in the wings. If they did not just draft him when they did then keeping Darnold makes much more sense. 

 

Cousins was saddled with expectations that were ridiculous if you ever watched him play.  He is a good QB that isn't a game changer.  He has talent, but not enough to be the difference between a Super Bowl and just making the playoffs.  This has been well known since his days at MSU.  He wasn't worth the money he was paid, but the market for QBs is so stupid he cashed in.  The Vikings should have known better.

He threw for 24000 yards roughly and 171 TDs in 6 years.  That is pretty solid.  Not light the world on fire but solid.  The hate he gets from a vocal minority is disgusting.

Sam was running hot for quite a while and cooled at the end.  He can easily be a Kirk Cousins or a Baker Mayfield and have a nice a career as a QB who can get 3500-4000 yards a season and so on.  If we didn't have a young guy waiting I would be fine keeping him around at a decent price but we do and someone is going to pay for him.  He earned a decent contract and no one should crap on the season he had just cause it ended badly. (not saying you are)

 


   
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

Posted by: @mnnavy

From Nick Shook at NFL.com

  • Steelers
  • Jets
  • Giants
  • Saints
  • Raiders
  • Browns
  • Colts
  • Titans

Regarding the Vikings, he says...

Alas, this feels like the most likely outcome after Darnold's disappointing finish. McCarthy is returning from a meniscus injury that cost him his rookie season, opening the door for Darnold's breakout campaign. The fashion in which it ended might tank his value enough to make a return to Minnesota possible, perhaps in the range my colleague Gregg Rosenthal proposed on NFL Daily: two years, $30 million. A $15 million-per-year contract for a plus backup is feasible financially, and the two parties have enough familiarity from the 2024 season to justify running it back. The difference, though, is Darnold would be returning as a projected backup. He's a reliable option and a nice insurance policy in the event McCarthy struggles or isn't able to get healthy enough to play. There is one concern, though: Darnold's return could create a controversial scenario like the one produced by the Nick Foles/Carson Wentz dynamic in Philadelphia following the Eagles' Super Bowl triumph over the Patriots at the end of the 2017 season. The Vikings don't need those headlines.

I dont think that is happening.  Someone will sign him.

 


   
ReplyQuote
upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2385
Rep Pts: 5755
 

Posted by: @handyman

Posted by: @mnnavy

From Nick Shook at NFL.com

  • Steelers
  • Jets
  • Giants
  • Saints
  • Raiders
  • Browns
  • Colts
  • Titans

Regarding the Vikings, he says...

Alas, this feels like the most likely outcome after Darnold's disappointing finish. McCarthy is returning from a meniscus injury that cost him his rookie season, opening the door for Darnold's breakout campaign. The fashion in which it ended might tank his value enough to make a return to Minnesota possible, perhaps in the range my colleague Gregg Rosenthal proposed on NFL Daily: two years, $30 million. A $15 million-per-year contract for a plus backup is feasible financially, and the two parties have enough familiarity from the 2024 season to justify running it back. The difference, though, is Darnold would be returning as a projected backup. He's a reliable option and a nice insurance policy in the event McCarthy struggles or isn't able to get healthy enough to play. There is one concern, though: Darnold's return could create a controversial scenario like the one produced by the Nick Foles/Carson Wentz dynamic in Philadelphia following the Eagles' Super Bowl triumph over the Patriots at the end of the 2017 season. The Vikings don't need those headlines.

I dont think that is happening.  Someone will sign him.

 

yeah i can't see any way he's coming back unless he's the starter. you don't come back to be a backup then relegating yourself to only signing backup deals. On top of that, you know that this fanbase is definitely the type to call for the backup QB and this will get gross in both directions regardless of who starts if the starter struggles. seems like a lose-lose outside of a 1 year deal where he's a bridge starter again because Mccarthy is still too green/hurt and Darnold is comfortable signing a lesser contract (can see pros and cons to this given how much he tanked his stock with the last 2 games and another good year probably nets him another 10m AAV on his next deal and signs for 4 years at 30AAV where if you go to the Giants for 3 years at 20AAV, you may be out of the league after that with how poorly they handle players; that said money in hand is worth more if it's a question). think they move on from Sam and roll with JJ unless there's more to his injury/development being slowed than we know of. he should be more than good to go by this fall and will have had a full offseason to learn, throw and develop even further. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
Snowcool08
(@snowcool08)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 787
Rep Pts: 1832
Post on old board: 6069
 

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @sunbone

Posted by: @slap-shot

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @gopher6

All they have to do is not re-sign Darnold, he is a terrible QB, if the Jets cut him NOBODY should sign him Fighting  

The QB with the 5th most passing yards and TDs in the league is “terrible” 

 

 

A lot of people said Cousins was terrible despite the stats.

 

I don’t remember too many people saying Cousins was terrible. It was more that he was slightly above average and way overpaid. Which I think was accurate. And as bad as Darnold played the last two weeks I think KOC should shoulder as much or more of the blame. Part of his job is to make some adjustments and to calm his QB down. He failed miserably at both. 

 

Tomato/tomahto on the terrible label, but the FACT is way too many fans shouldered the lack of playoff success on Cousins' shoulders and now they want to blame KOC and forgive Darnold. 

They had to move on from Cousins because of the contract he wanted don't get me wrong, but sorry Darnold just isn't the answer.  The overall negative body of work is just too damning to overlook.  This season for him was lipstick on a pig and they have McCarthy waiting in the wings. If they did not just draft him when they did then keeping Darnold makes much more sense. 

 

Based on the reactions, it’s about 90% of people blame Darnold while only 10% are blaming KOC. Very few people are making him shoulder this loss.  

Sure Darnold sucked before he got here, but he was a top 10 QB the majority of the season. The question is was that all KOC doing that for him or did Darnold actually find something and just needs to keep the for the postseason?

 


   
ReplyQuote
streakygopher
(@streakygopher)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 1525
Rep Pts: 3795
Post on old board: 15478
 

Posted by: @snowcool08

Based on the reactions, it’s about 90% of people blame Darnold while only 10% are blaming KOC. Very few people are making him shoulder this loss.  

Sure Darnold sucked before he got here, but he was a top 10 QB the majority of the season. The question is was that all KOC doing that for him or did Darnold actually find something and just needs to keep the for the postseason?

It can't be 90/10 because that would exonerate the O-line.

I'm persuaded that Darnold is the main figure in this drama after watching a couple of video breakdowns after the Lions' loss. He missed or otherwise overthrew receivers with regularity. 


   
ReplyQuote
bearpaw28
(@bearpaw28)
Broten Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1600
Rep Pts: 2705
Post on old board: 6912
 

@streakygopher

Sure, some of it was on KOC & his play calls. Some was on the OL. But Sam didn’t even look like the same player who torched a solid Green Bay defense TWICE this season.

For most of the season Darnold threw on time, in rhythm. That’s what all the top QB’s do 80% of the time. A hand full can hold the ball longer - Mahomes, Allen, (ARod in his prime). When U hold the ball, bad things usually happen.

Look, not saying Sam Darnold is now 💩 because he had 2 AWFUL games after 13 out of 16 where his QB rating was > 100. But, Vikings have 10th overall 2024 draft pick on our roster at QB. He’s not getting PAID big until 3 more years are in the books. He’s 21 years old & the ultimate goal is playing in the SB & winning it! The issue with Darnold is he held the ball with a glazed look on his face,  looking confused & worst of all HESITATING to make decisions & plays during the two biggest games of his career. That’s hard to get past! 


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

This is pretty good.

https://twitter.com/JBergsss/status/1880035576902217966

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
Goldy77
(@goldy77)
Micheletti Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 323
Rep Pts: 680
 

Posted by: @frozen4champs

This is pretty good.

https://twitter.com/JBergsss/status/1880035576902217966

Ain’t that the truth

 


   
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

Here is the thing Darnold is likely not as good as he played most of the season but he also isn't nearly as bad as he was playing for the Jets or the last 2 games of the season. (based on what reports say)  He is a talented QB who is the right QB for a team that doesn't have SB aspirations but wants to be competitive.  He can win games, and he can lead teams to victories but he obviously has issues in his game and struggles to get out of a funk when things go south in the bigger games.  If you look at his days at USC it is rather similar. 

I will also say, the line was a problem after Darrisaw got hurt and he often bailed them out.  Not having a running game (something KOC needs to fix if he wants a future in this league) made it ten times worse.  Sam works best in Play Action but no one cares about a fake if you have no running game and dont even really try to have one.

He can't come back though as the backup because the last thing this squad needs is a QB controversy and unfortunately whether it is the Gophers or the Vikings the fans prefer the backup to the starter even if the starter is playing well.  Christ I remember when the fans wanted Todd Bauman to start or Gus Frerotte.  If JJ struggled (as a rookie would) the calls for Sam would be loud and the boos would be worse than usual.  Either Sam starts or he has to go somewhere else.  I think the Steelers would be a team that should go after him I think he would fit in great there.


   
ReplyQuote



Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4523
Rep Pts: 10075
Post on old board: 18942
 

What Darnold is though Handy at his best isn't good enough to sign him for what other franchises are likely willing to give him given combined with the fact that McCarthy is in the wings.  Plus if we're being honest the Vikings right now have a lot of holes and need $$ to fill them.  I appreciate what Darnold did but unless he takes a discount good luck to him and I hope it works out.


   
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

Yes I know I said that.  I am not advocating bringing him back. 


   
ReplyQuote
Hammy
(@hammy)
Stauber Level
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 258
Rep Pts: 868
Post on old board: 14946
 

The Vikes way overachieved what I expected. Just like Darnold did. I thought this would be a 7 win season with growing pains. It was a fun year in that sense. But I never got my hopes up that they would do anything in the playoffs. Since the 70s, we've seen that movie way too many times with the Vikings.

Darnold was a nice story about being resilient and fighting through all the haters he had. I give him a lot of credit for it and I was truly happy for him. I like a good redemption story. Unfortunately, I also believe there are enough flaws in his game that I don't think he'd be a good long term solution here. I'd franchise tag him. Either get another year out of him before turning the keys over to McCarthy or make use of his value with the tag this offseason and see if you can gain assets in the process.

We have enough weak spots in this team that I'd rather take my chances with a QB on a rookie deal and see how they can use the cap money elsewhere in building around him. Kwesi has been pretty spotty with his drafting (which I don't like) but he has done a relatively good job in free agency.

Get KOC locked into a deal. The man earned it and he is among the brightest coaches out there. Especially given his age.

 


   
bearpaw28 reacted
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1881816550635962791

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

Vikings sign Pro Bowl defensive lineman Jonathan Allen for 3 years 60 million.

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1899429483519586719

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

Vikings sign OT Will Fries to a 5 year 88 million deal.

https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1899451511916171407

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

Vikings are closing in on Pro Bowl DT Javon Hargrave.

https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1899452275539468691

 

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
Snowcool08
(@snowcool08)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 787
Rep Pts: 1832
Post on old board: 6069
 

I’m glad they’re spending the money on the OL and DL. Can never have enough lineman. 


   
ReplyQuote
gopher6
(@gopher6)
Leopold Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1392
Rep Pts: 1885
Post on old board: 5547
Topic starter  

Vikes lose another QB

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/44206117/qb-daniel-jones-finalizing-1-year-deal-colts-sources-say

Aloha!


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2766
Rep Pts: 5505
Post on old board: 12555
 

Posted by: @gopher6

Vikes lose another QB

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/44206117/qb-daniel-jones-finalizing-1-year-deal-colts-sources-say

please God don’t let this mean the Vikings sign Rodgers.

 


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2766
Rep Pts: 5505
Post on old board: 12555
 

Posted by: @frozen4champs

Vikings sign OT Will Fries to a 5 year 88 million deal.

https://twitter.com/JFowlerESPN/status/1899451511916171407

This is awesome!

 


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

Posted by: @bertogliat

Posted by: @gopher6

Vikes lose another QB

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/44206117/qb-daniel-jones-finalizing-1-year-deal-colts-sources-say

please God don’t let this mean the Vikings sign Rodgers.

 

right! Cuz they’re gonna need someone, not him but a veteran with some mobility would be nice. I honestly don’t even know who’s out there to go after yet. I’m not up to speed on where JJ is on his recovery maybe he’s good to go? Even so a quality backup would be nice.

 


   
ReplyQuote



Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Vikings to trade or release Bradbury. I’m guessing he’s unwilling or can’t move to guard.

They also traded Ingram for a 6 next year. 


   
ReplyQuote
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Apparently the Vikings are what’s holding up the Rodgers decision. F’n great…..

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/insider-believes-aaron-rodgers-first-choice-is-the-vikings-01jpajzcd5qr


   
ReplyQuote
upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2385
Rep Pts: 5755
 

Posted by: @bigbeer

Apparently the Vikings are what’s holding up the Rodgers decision. F’n great…..

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/vikings/news/insider-believes-aaron-rodgers-first-choice-is-the-vikings-01jpajzcd5qr

 first for him, not for us. Same as any qb on the market and you know he’s fine letting others wait as he’s a diva and I’m sure thinks he could put up 40 TDs for MN. 

don’t see him and KOC getting along well

 


   
ReplyQuote
gator
(@gator)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 5127
Rep Pts: 8469
Post on old board: 16243
 

Carson Wentz “in his pants” to Minnesota?!?!?! I rather have Rodgers than one of several NDSU 1st Rd. qb bust.

Keep your stick on the ice...


   
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

I wouldn't...dude is a cancer and no longer has the skills to back it up.  Wentz sucks but I bet he wouldn't sabotage the team.


   
F Da Sue reacted
ReplyQuote
Sunbone
(@sunbone)
Micheletti Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 177
Rep Pts: 552
Post on old board: 8761
 

If the Vikings care about “culture” as much as they claim to, they don’t get within a million miles of Rodgers. 


   
F Da Sue, MikeEruzione11, gator and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

A lot of people thought Sam Darnold was a bust but put a decent qb in the right system and they can thrive especially with a Justin Jefferson for a target. I have no problem with a guy like Wentz as a Viking. KOC knows what he’s doing.


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

Anyone but Rogers at this point.


   
F Da Sue, Steve MN and MNNavy reacted
ReplyQuote
HandyNotDan
(@handyman)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2202
Rep Pts: 6289
Post on old board: 28736
 

Posted by: @sunbone

If the Vikings care about “culture” as much as they claim to, they don’t get within a million miles of Rodgers. 

Yep.  Rodgers would nuke KOC as soon as he has a bad game.  He would care more about being Pat Macafees terrible show than he would about the team winning. 

 


   
ReplyQuote
gopheritall
(@gopheritall)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 472
Rep Pts: 1127
 

I have no doubt that Rodgers would have a great chance to be successful with these Vikings. However, I would stop cheering for the Vikings and likely cheer against them if they sign him.

Just put McCarthy in place and bring in a backup. I am surprised that Jones didn't want to ride backup with a chance at a ring. The Vikings must have seen what they needed to and didn't want Jones.

I can hardly wait for the Rodgers garbage to be done.

 


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6680
Rep Pts: 16906
Post on old board: 9626
 

Vikings trade for a backup running back.

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1901073912949068105

I was recently informed by a GPLer that I'm related to Airey


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

Takes some pressure off of jones being healthy every game. Mason was hurt at the end of last year too but I like him, he’s explosive and can carry a workload when needed.


   
ReplyQuote



upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2385
Rep Pts: 5755
 

Posted by: @camo-coat-guy

Takes some pressure off of jones being healthy every game. Mason was hurt at the end of last year too but I like him, he’s explosive and can carry a workload when needed.

dude was my fantasy sleeper early this year and he runs HARD. There’s no dancing. Vikings fans will like him

 


   
ReplyQuote
camo coat guy
(@camo-coat-guy)
Leopold Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1785
 

He didn’t catch much for passes like CMC does while he was out which I didn’t understand but yes he’s hit the hole hard north and south without hesitation.


   
ReplyQuote
Page 22 / 23

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad