Wolves / NBA
 
Notifications
Clear all

Wolves / NBA

1,022 Posts
69 Users
161 Reactions
21.4 K Views
YoungEagle
(@youngeagle)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 849
Rep Pts: 1986
 

How iron clad is the target center lease? And when does it expire.

I know that’s one of the only reasons (iron clad lease) why the Pats are still in Boston. Kraft owned the stadium and refused to give up the lease so the owner sold him the team.

'29, '40, '74, '76, '79, '02, & '03
GPL's Resident Cabin Enthusiast & Cadets Hockey Fan


   
ReplyQuote
JWG
 JWG
(@jwg)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 1054
Rep Pts: 1946
Post on old board: 8686
 

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.


   
ReplyQuote
Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4133
Rep Pts: 8530
Post on old board: 18942
 

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.


   
ReplyQuote
JWG
 JWG
(@jwg)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 1054
Rep Pts: 1946
Post on old board: 8686
 

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

Not what Glen said. Here’s his quote:

Quote:
"They will keep the team here, yes. We will put it in the agreement. At this point we have a letter of intent, but when we make up the contract we’ll put that in there. That’s no problem. That won’t be a problem."

Which is why they’ll move in 2025 vs. 2023.


   
ReplyQuote
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 1047
Rep Pts: 2442
Post on old board: 5631
 

Is there a petition that can be signed that would force the new owners to move the team?


   
ReplyQuote
Greyeagle
(@greyeagle)
Mayasich Level Moderator Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 4401
Rep Pts: 12069
Post on old board: 21741
 

From what I saw the the Lynx are part of the deal. Methinks the possibility of the Lynx moving will elicit more of a response than the 'wolves.

“When your best friend is the son of God, you get tired of losing every argument.”

― Christopher Moore, Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


   
ReplyQuote
Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4133
Rep Pts: 8530
Post on old board: 18942
 

JWG wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

Not what Glen said. Here’s his quote:

Quote:
"They will keep the team here, yes. We will put it in the agreement. At this point we have a letter of intent, but when we make up the contract we’ll put that in there. That’s no problem. That won’t be a problem."

Which is why they’ll move in 2025 vs. 2023.

They cannot include a clause that keeps the team here indefinitely, and even one that is temporary might not hold up from everything I've read.


   
ReplyQuote




Bonin21
(@bonin21)
Leopold Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 1535
Rep Pts: 1537
Post on old board: 17892
 

Meh take em both


   
ReplyQuote
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 2641
Rep Pts: 4583
Post on old board: 9428
 

Any NBA team in Vegas will have NBA players lining up the play there


   
ReplyQuote
YoungEagle
(@youngeagle)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 849
Rep Pts: 1986
 

Bigbeer wrote:

Any NBA team in Vegas will have NBA players lining up the play there

With 30 teams it seems more likely NBA expands to 32 rather than move teams. My guess is Vegas and Seattle are expansion franchises in the next few years.

'29, '40, '74, '76, '79, '02, & '03
GPL's Resident Cabin Enthusiast & Cadets Hockey Fan


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

YoungEagle wrote:

Bigbeer wrote:

Any NBA team in Vegas will have NBA players lining up the play there

With 30 teams it seems more likely NBA expands to 32 rather than move teams. My guess is Vegas and Seattle are expansion franchises in the next few years.

Expansion means more money for the owners. They (the NBA owners) will almost certainly approve a request for an expansion team or two before they'd relocate.


   
ReplyQuote
Zwak
 Zwak
(@zwak)
Broten Level Moderator Golden
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 2350
Rep Pts: 2768
Post on old board: 11850
 

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

Not what Glen said. Here’s his quote:

Quote:
"They will keep the team here, yes. We will put it in the agreement. At this point we have a letter of intent, but when we make up the contract we’ll put that in there. That’s no problem. That won’t be a problem."

Which is why they’ll move in 2025 vs. 2023.

They cannot include a clause that keeps the team here indefinitely, and even one that is temporary might not hold up from everything I've read.

Correct. Chris Hine in StarTribune wrote an article last July about why.

https://www.startribune.com/taylor-won-t-consider-just-anybody-as-a-timberwolves-suitor/571908842/?refresh=true

The league has to approve any sale and would likely not approve any sale that includes language that locks an ownership group into keeping a team in a certain city.

Also from the article:

Quote:
The same could apply to a court, which could rule that restrictions might be too stringent to the business’ ability to operate as the owners see fit. For instance, if the economy in Minneapolis or the state tanks and a move would make financial sense for the league or owners, a court could rule any previous agreement to not move the team would be too harmful to the overall business.

Personally I would not be heartbroken if the Wolves moved.


   
ReplyQuote
gopher6
(@gopher6)
Bonin Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1105
Rep Pts: 1469
Post on old board: 5547
 

Zwak wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

Not what Glen said. Here’s his quote:

Quote:
"They will keep the team here, yes. We will put it in the agreement. At this point we have a letter of intent, but when we make up the contract we’ll put that in there. That’s no problem. That won’t be a problem."

Which is why they’ll move in 2025 vs. 2023.

They cannot include a clause that keeps the team here indefinitely, and even one that is temporary might not hold up from everything I've read.

Correct. Chris Hine in StarTribune wrote an article last July about why.

https://www.startribune.com/taylor-won-t-consider-just-anybody-as-a-timberwolves-suitor/571908842/?refresh=true

The league has to approve any sale and would likely not approve any sale that includes language that locks an ownership group into keeping a team in a certain city.

Also from the article:

Quote:
The same could apply to a court, which could rule that restrictions might be too stringent to the business’ ability to operate as the owners see fit. For instance, if the economy in Minneapolis or the state tanks and a move would make financial sense for the league or owners, a court could rule any previous agreement to not move the team would be too harmful to the overall business.

Personally I would not be heartbroken if the Wolves moved.

Same here I can’t stand the NBA=Nothing but attitude

Aloha!


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2577
Rep Pts: 4901
Post on old board: 12555
 

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

$50 million won't stop an NBA owner from moving. Move the team from MN and the value of the franchise will probably jump $100 million overnight.

I don't even like the wolves, but all I ask is they write into the contract the naming rights stay with the state of MN if the team is moved out of state. The history of the Wolves franchised can't be moved. Luc Longly and Pooh Richardson lore stays put!


   
ReplyQuote




Bonin21
(@bonin21)
Leopold Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 1535
Rep Pts: 1537
Post on old board: 17892
 

The Twin Cities reign as Loserville of all four big sports will finally have an asterisk soon!


   
ReplyQuote
Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4133
Rep Pts: 8530
Post on old board: 18942
 

Bertogliat wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

$50 million won't stop an NBA owner from moving. Move the team from MN and the value of the franchise will probably jump $100 million overnight.

I don't even like the wolves, but all I ask is they write into the contract the naming rights stay with the state of MN if the team is moved out of state. The history of the Wolves franchised can't be moved. Luc Longly and Pooh Richardson lore stays put!

Agreed that $50 million won't stop.them. I should have made that more clear.

While I'm not an NBA fan like I used to be, it's never a good thing for a franchise to move. I hope they figure it out and elect to stay. Their existence has no negative impact on my life and there are fans in the state that will be bummed out.


   
ReplyQuote
Karlsson
(@karlsson)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2938
Rep Pts: 6158
 

Slap Shot wrote:

Bertogliat wrote:

Slap Shot wrote:

JWG wrote:

Contract will have a no move clause. So, it will be 4-5 years before they move.

There is no such thing. The only thing stopping them will be a $50 million buyout clause with Target Center and possibly short term Vegas and Seattle getting franchises via expansion.

$50 million won't stop an NBA owner from moving. Move the team from MN and the value of the franchise will probably jump $100 million overnight.

I don't even like the wolves, but all I ask is they write into the contract the naming rights stay with the state of MN if the team is moved out of state. The history of the Wolves franchised can't be moved. Luc Longly and Pooh Richardson lore stays put!

Agreed that $50 million won't stop.them. I should have made that more clear.

While I'm not an NBA fan like I used to be, it's never a good thing for a franchise to move. I hope they figure it out and elect to stay. Their existence has no negative impact on my life and there are fans in the state that will be bummed out.

Once "alternate" or "+" feeds became a thing I no longer actively wanted the Wolves to go away. Mr. Green


   
ReplyQuote
MATT
 MATT
(@matt)
Wooger Level Golden
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 166
Rep Pts: 248
 

https://twitter.com/DaneMooreNBA/status/1382126016102084608

Edit to add: ??


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

https://twitter.com/threesley/status/1384542616914702341?s=19

This kid is turning into something special.


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2577
Rep Pts: 4901
Post on old board: 12555
 

Beauner wrote:
< https://twitter.com/threesley/status/1384542616914702341?s=19

This kid is turning into something special.

Yet they're as bad as any other Timberwolves team. 27 games out of first and 13 games behind the last "play-in" team for expanded playoff. Just a half game out of last place in all of the NBA.

I doubt the NBA allows them to win the "lottery" again, but they may need it again just to not suck at Timberwolves standards. Yeesh.


   
ReplyQuote
Bonin21
(@bonin21)
Leopold Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 1535
Rep Pts: 1537
Post on old board: 17892
 

It's a 2% chance to win back to back 1st overall picks. That won't happen. Maybe they'll get the hometown kid Suggs. They'll suck until A-Rod moves them somewhere.


   
ReplyQuote




Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2577
Rep Pts: 4901
Post on old board: 12555
 

Bonin21 wrote:

It's a 2% chance to win back to back 1st overall picks. That won't happen. Maybe they'll get the hometown kid Suggs. They'll suck until A-Rod moves them somewhere.

MN has a 14% chance...if you think it isn't rigged.

http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds

Looks like they have a 60% chance of losing the pick to Golden State. If you do understand the draft is rigged, this means the wolves have a 0% chance at the #1 pick.. Wink


   
ReplyQuote
Bonin21
(@bonin21)
Leopold Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 1535
Rep Pts: 1537
Post on old board: 17892
 

Bertogliat wrote:

Bonin21 wrote:

It's a 2% chance to win back to back 1st overall picks. That won't happen. Maybe they'll get the hometown kid Suggs. They'll suck until A-Rod moves them somewhere.

MN has a 14% chance...if you think it isn't rigged.

http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds

Looks like they have a 60% chance of losing the pick to Golden State. If you do understand the draft is rigged, this means the wolves have a 0% chance at the #1 pick.. Wink

14% but the odds of two #1's in a row is 2%.

The same as the odds of a #1 then a #3. #3 then #1, and so on.


   
ReplyQuote
Gopher Fan 26
(@gopher-fan-26)
Lucia Level Golden
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 56
Rep Pts: 96
 

Bonin21 wrote:

Bertogliat wrote:

Bonin21 wrote:

It's a 2% chance to win back to back 1st overall picks. That won't happen. Maybe they'll get the hometown kid Suggs. They'll suck until A-Rod moves them somewhere.

MN has a 14% chance...if you think it isn't rigged.

http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds

Looks like they have a 60% chance of losing the pick to Golden State. If you do understand the draft is rigged, this means the wolves have a 0% chance at the #1 pick.. Wink

14% but the odds of two #1's in a row is 2%.

The same as the odds of a #1 then a #3. #3 then #1, and so on.

Huh? If the odds that the Wolves get the #1 pick this year are 14%, then the odds of them getting two in a row are 14%.


   
ReplyQuote
Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2577
Rep Pts: 4901
Post on old board: 12555
 

Gopher Fan 26 wrote:

Bonin21 wrote:

Bertogliat wrote:

Bonin21 wrote:

It's a 2% chance to win back to back 1st overall picks. That won't happen. Maybe they'll get the hometown kid Suggs. They'll suck until A-Rod moves them somewhere.

MN has a 14% chance...if you think it isn't rigged.

http://www.tankathon.com/pick_odds

Looks like they have a 60% chance of losing the pick to Golden State. If you do understand the draft is rigged, this means the wolves have a 0% chance at the #1 pick.. Wink

14% but the odds of two #1's in a row is 2%.

The same as the odds of a #1 then a #3. #3 then #1, and so on.

Huh? If the odds that the Wolves get the #1 pick this year are 14%, then the odds of them getting two in a row are 14%.

It's 0.14 x 0.14 = 0.0196 or 2% if you look at nothing but the percentages. It's probably much less than that for most teams as they would presumably get better and not be in last place the year after a #1 overall pick. But then you have the Timberwolves. LoL

But the Wolves have already knocked out the first half of that so it's now 14% for them going back to back. Amusing (intended spelling) it is not rigged.


   
ReplyQuote
Steve MN
(@steve-mn)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 2848
Rep Pts: 5639
Post on old board: 10695
 

Given that the Timberwolves got the last #1 pick, the odds of them getting 2 in a row are 14% (Assuming they don't suddenly get out of the hold they're in currently, of course)

Also the 60% chance losing it to Golden State if they DO get the #1 isn't counted there.

B1G refs... corrupt, or just incompetent?


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

Steve MN wrote:

Given that the Timberwolves got the last #1 pick, the odds of them getting 2 in a row are 14% (Assuming they don't suddenly get out of the hold they're in currently, of course)

Also the 60% chance losing it to Golden State if they DO get the #1 isn't counted there.

There is no chance of losing it to GS if they get the number one, number two, or number three pick.

If it falls outside the top 3, it becomes Golden State's. It is a top-3 protected pick. So it's a 60% chance they have to trade it, a 40% chance they keep it, and a 14% chance they pick #1.


   
ReplyQuote
Steve MN
(@steve-mn)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 2848
Rep Pts: 5639
Post on old board: 10695
 

Beauner wrote:

Steve MN wrote:

Given that the Timberwolves got the last #1 pick, the odds of them getting 2 in a row are 14% (Assuming they don't suddenly get out of the hold they're in currently, of course)

Also the 60% chance losing it to Golden State if they DO get the #1 isn't counted there.

There is no chance of losing it to GS if they get the number one, number two, or number three pick.

If it falls outside the top 3, it becomes Golden State's. It is a top-3 protected pick. So it's a 60% chance they have to trade it, a 40% chance they keep it, and a 14% chance they pick #1.

Ahhhh... thanks for the clarification, I hadn't looked that close.

B1G refs... corrupt, or just incompetent?


   
ReplyQuote




davescharf
(@davescharf)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 1062
Rep Pts: 1126
Post on old board: 11138
 

I just read the Wolves finished 3-0 against the team that will be the #1 seed in the Western Conference this year. I also saw they were 8-6 this year when Towns and Russell play together.

That's not going to set the world on fire but you have to wonder if this is a small step towards some respectability.


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

davescharf wrote:

I just read the Wolves finished 3-0 against the team that will be the #1 seed in the Western Conference this year. I also saw they were 8-6 this year when Towns and Russell play together.

That's not going to set the world on fire but you have to wonder if this is a small step towards some respectability.

Yes. Utah is 44-14 against everyone else and 0-3 against Minnesota.

The Wolves are about to win their 3rd straight game, their longest winning streak of the year. First win @ Houston since 2012 (although the Rockets are the worst team in basketball this year).

They've been mostly playing better basketball with Russell and Towns getting to play together, as you alluded to. With those 2 and Anthony Edwards they've got the makings of a really good big 3.

McDaniels looks like he could end up being a very useful rotational piece, Beasley has already shown he can be a big time scorer, Naz Reid looks like he can be a serviceable big man, and Okogie is a very good wing defender. They're still one real PF/C away from being a legitimate playoff contender (though I do have some optimism that McDaniels could end up being that guy, he's only a rookie and has already shown some ability to score a bit and he's mostly been good defensively in the post despite being relatively skinny).

If they do get to keep their pick this year, Evan Mobley could be a really interesting pick. If not, I wouldn't be surprised to hear them trying to trade a guy like Beasley to somebody like Cleveland to try to get a chance to draft Jalen Johnson or Scottie Barnes to try to solidify the PF spot.


   
ReplyQuote
YoungEagle
(@youngeagle)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 849
Rep Pts: 1986
 

davescharf wrote:

I just read the Wolves finished 3-0 against the team that will be the #1 seed in the Western Conference this year. I also saw they were 8-6 this year when Towns and Russell play together.

That's not going to set the world on fire but you have to wonder if this is a small step towards some respectability.

I was at the game on Monday night. It was fun to be at a sporting event again since the last one was the state hockey tournament last March. Couldn’t believe they won..especially after getting down 18 early. Although the last Wolves game I was at they beat Lebron. Maybe I’m just good luck.

'29, '40, '74, '76, '79, '02, & '03
GPL's Resident Cabin Enthusiast & Cadets Hockey Fan


   
ReplyQuote
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mariucci Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 3966
Rep Pts: 9911
 

YoungEagle wrote:

davescharf wrote:

I just read the Wolves finished 3-0 against the team that will be the #1 seed in the Western Conference this year. I also saw they were 8-6 this year when Towns and Russell play together.

That's not going to set the world on fire but you have to wonder if this is a small step towards some respectability.

I was at the game on Monday night. It was fun to be at a sporting event again since the last one was the state hockey tournament last March. Couldn’t believe they won..especially after getting down 18 early. Although the last Wolves game I was at they beat Lebron. Maybe I’m just good luck.

For the good of the Timberwolves future success they would like to offer Young Eagle life long season tickets if he agrees to attend every game for the rest of his life. :D


   
ReplyQuote
YoungEagle
(@youngeagle)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 849
Rep Pts: 1986
 

CollegeHockeyAddict wrote:

YoungEagle wrote:

davescharf wrote:

I just read the Wolves finished 3-0 against the team that will be the #1 seed in the Western Conference this year. I also saw they were 8-6 this year when Towns and Russell play together.

That's not going to set the world on fire but you have to wonder if this is a small step towards some respectability.

I was at the game on Monday night. It was fun to be at a sporting event again since the last one was the state hockey tournament last March. Couldn’t believe they won..especially after getting down 18 early. Although the last Wolves game I was at they beat Lebron. Maybe I’m just good luck.

For the good of the Timberwolves future success they would like to offer Young Eagle life long season tickets if he agrees to attend every game for the rest of his life. :D

Oh man... no deal unless it includes unlimited booze. I’d need it.

'29, '40, '74, '76, '79, '02, & '03
GPL's Resident Cabin Enthusiast & Cadets Hockey Fan


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

Wolves beat Golden State tonight 126-114. Fourth straight win.

26 points, 6 rebounds and 6 assists from Rubio, 25 points from Ant, 22 points and 11 boards from KAT.


   
ReplyQuote
Bonin21
(@bonin21)
Leopold Level
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 1535
Rep Pts: 1537
Post on old board: 17892
 

Get a worse draft pick. Classic


   
ReplyQuote




Bertogliat
(@bertogliat)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 2577
Rep Pts: 4901
Post on old board: 12555
 

Bonin21 wrote:

Get a worse draft pick. Classic

Or none, if they are outside the Top 3.


   
ReplyQuote
Butters Stotch
(@butters-stotch)
Lucia Level
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 41
Rep Pts: 41

   
ReplyQuote
Jerry Peters fka DAWoJ
(@don-adams-wheel-of-justice)
Wooger Level Golden
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 196
Rep Pts: 446
 

Glen Taylor is a snake.


   
ReplyQuote
Border Gopher
(@border-gopher)
Wooger Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 266
Rep Pts: 456
 

It always sounded like it was on shaky legal ground from the get-go. The real thing stopping the new owners from moving will be the desire of the league and owners to collect expansion fees from Seattle and Las Vegas. With those two cities off of the table, where else would they move them to that would be a much better proposition?


   
ReplyQuote
mnpuckguy
(@mnpuckguy)
Lucia Level
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 67
Rep Pts: 82
 

Alex Rodriguez is the snake! Trusting him to keep the team here is the biggest mistake the Wolves could make!! He will move the Wolves, the first chance he gets. My guess is Seattle!!


   
ReplyQuote
davescharf
(@davescharf)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 1062
Rep Pts: 1126
Post on old board: 11138
 

mnpuckguy wrote:

Alex Rodriguez is the snake! Trusting him to keep the team here is the biggest mistake the Wolves could make!! He will move the Wolves, the first chance he gets. My guess is Seattle!!

Seattle and Vegas are getting expansion franchises. The owners can get $2B that route versus some paltry move fee.

They might still move but it won’t be either of those two places.


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

mnpuckguy wrote:

Alex Rodriguez is the snake! Trusting him to keep the team here is the biggest mistake the Wolves could make!! He will move the Wolves, the first chance he gets. My guess is Seattle!!

I would be shocked if the NBA doesn't put an expansion team in Seattle and Vegas. That is big $$$ they'd be pissing away by moving a team instead of putting an expansion team there.


   
ReplyQuote




MNNavy
(@mnnavy)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 22 years ago
Posts: 842
Rep Pts: 1419
 

As multiple people have stated, Seattle and Lost Wages are getting expansion franchises. That means moving to an "untapped" market. If I were a betting man, I would guess St. Louis, San Diego, or Nashville (in no particular order).

Tact is the ability to step on a man's toes without messing up the shine on his shoes - Harry S Truman


   
ReplyQuote
frozen4champs
(@frozen4champs)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 5980
Rep Pts: 14241
Post on old board: 9626
Topic starter  

Former Gopher Bobby Jackson named head coach of the Kings G league team. Looks like it is the next step before becoming an NBA head coach. Served as an assistant on the Kings last year.

[media] https://twitter.com/StocktonKings/status/1397976978523930627/photo/1 [/media]

I'm 50% factual and 50% sarcastic. When you get to know me, you will know which is which.


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

MNNavy wrote:

As multiple people have stated, Seattle and Lost Wages are getting expansion franchises. That means moving to an "untapped" market. If I were a betting man, I would guess St. Louis, San Diego, or Nashville (in no particular order).

I'd be surprised if any of those cities were a real possibility for relocation. MAYBE St. Louis but they just lost a damn NFL team (granted, the Rams owners are dicks, but still). I could see Kansas City getting some mention as a relocation spot. The NBA already has 4 teams based in CA. Plus approximately 15 D1 NCAA hoops teams. I don't see a huge benefit in adding a 5th. Tennessee already has one NBA team. Not sure they have the fan support for a second team. I think Kansas City would be a better bet than any of those spots, personally.

It's more likely that the new ownership group tries to get a new arena built vs. moving them out of Minnesota, IMHO. Minnesota has the ability to be an extremely good basketball market when the teams are good. It's just a matter of the team getting good. Back when KG was here and the Wolves were good, the Wolves were exceptionally popular in Minnesota. We're a top 15ish market nationally that has a ton of high end local youth talent.

Unfortunately with Glen's terrible ownership, ticket prices have continued to increase despite the product on the court being abysmal. In 2019 the average (this is including the high end seats, courtside, etc) ticket price for the Wolves was $107. The lowest price was $10, which I assume is top row of the upper deck, and highest was $204. That's absurd given how terrible the team was.

Hopefully the new ownership group comes in and repairs the damaged relationship with the fans (seriously, have you ever heard a fan say anything positive about Glen Taylor?) and can reconcile the fandom.


   
ReplyQuote
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 2641
Rep Pts: 4583
Post on old board: 9428
 

Imagine being a Suns fan: your team sucks for years but you put it together and get the 2 seed and you draw Lebron James in the first round cause really good teams know you just need to make the playoffs...


   
ReplyQuote
Slap Shot
(@slap-shot)
Mariucci Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 4133
Rep Pts: 8530
Post on old board: 18942
 

For those stating SEA and LV are getting expansion teams this is pure speculation to date. While likely to happen some of you make it sound like it's a 100% done deal. It's also possible Taylor is privy to something being afoot that the public yet isn't.


   
ReplyQuote
Chris83
(@chris83)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 695
Rep Pts: 1417
Post on old board: 5215
 

Bigbeer wrote:

Imagine being a Suns fan: your team sucks for years but you put it together and get the 2 seed and you draw Lebron James in the first round cause really good teams know you just need to make the playoffs...

As long as the Lakers made the post-season in some fashion, they were going to be the Western Conference and most likely, NBA favorite. James played 45 games out of 72 and Davis played 36; 34 wins would have gotten them into the playoffs, so why push any harder? If the NBA is fortunate, they end up with a Lakers-Brooklyn final, which will generate interest based on the players and markets involved. But "seeding" means virtually nothing regarding who wins titles.


   
ReplyQuote
Beauner
(@beauner)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 2442
Rep Pts: 3634
Post on old board: 30840
 

Slap Shot wrote:

For those stating SEA and LV are getting expansion teams this is pure speculation to date. While likely to happen some of you make it sound like it's a 100% done deal. It's also possible Taylor is privy to something being afoot that the public yet isn't.

It's not a certainty, no. But given the current state of things it seems like more a matter of WHEN than IF.


   
ReplyQuote




Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 2641
Rep Pts: 4583
Post on old board: 9428
 

Kevin Durant showing why he’s one of the greatest scorers in NBA history


   
ReplyQuote
Page 3 / 21