Sparty @ Gophers --...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad


[Closed] Sparty @ Gophers -- Dec 13 & 14

337 Posts
64 Users
121 Reactions
4,099 Views
uofm86
(@uofm86)
Lucia Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 34
Rep Pts: 84
 

As College Hockey Addict said he had a good tournament last year, rather surprising he was cut.

I do get the Willis Reed reference, good one very iconic.

 


   
bearpaw28
(@bearpaw28)
Broten Level
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 1600
Rep Pts: 2705
Post on old board: 6912
 

Bucky beats Michigan 4-0, 3 straight games without scoring a goal for the ugly helmets! 


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Ziemer 23 seconds in!!!!!!


   
BlueBandit24
(@bluebandit24)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 803
Rep Pts: 1923
 

Ziemer opens the scoring. Electric start.


   
The Rube
(@the-rube)
Mayasich Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 6866
Rep Pts: 10542
Post on old board: 35040
 

GOAL!

When you tell somebody somethin', it depends on what part of the United States you're standin' in... as to just how dumb you are.


   
BlueBandit24
(@bluebandit24)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 803
Rep Pts: 1923
 

Absolutely on fire a minute in. Awesome to watch.


   
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

BOOOOOOOM


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Snuggy came out flying and was a big factor on that goal.

Right after Ziemer scores Snuggy jumps up in excitement (can see it in the video). That is kind of interesting for a goal in the first period. I suspect this could be a case of Snuggy knowing that getting off to a good start, scoring first is big playing short handed tonight. Plus I take it as a sign of the energy, excitement he and the team has brought to this game. 

https://twitter.com/GopherHockey/status/1867745721975218303


   
Golden FE Ranger
(@golden-fe-ranger)
Micheletti Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 153
Rep Pts: 503
 

Looking good so far!


   
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

That was too close to whistle that offside in my humble opinion. Glad it didn’t lead to a goal


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

Posted by: @boats

That was too close to whistle that offside in my humble opinion. Glad it didn’t lead to a goal

Watched it half a dozen times, it was the wrong call

 


   
Boats reacted
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

The lack of consistency on calling/not calling interference when a forward chips the puck into the offensive zone and defensemen interferes/holding the forward gets on my nerves.


   



BlueBandit24
(@bluebandit24)
Leopold Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 803
Rep Pts: 1923
 

Incredible speed from Moore. Great finish by Lamb.


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Sparty ties it at 1

But a few minutes later LAMB!!!!!!!!! puts the Good Guys back ahead.


   
rowshkex
(@rowshkex)
Micheletti Level
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 201
Rep Pts: 656
Post on old board: 5728
 

I'm sorry but if you skate with your head down and forward, it shouldn't be a penalty if someone hits you in the head.  You should have your head up all the time.


   
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

no way that’s a game. Dammit man


   
upnorthkid
(@upnorthkid)
Brooks Level
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 2386
Rep Pts: 5756
 

Pretty soft game call to me. Doesn’t follow through at all but a very dumb hit you can’t make


   
Boats reacted
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Michel gets a 5 minute major and a game misconduct. The Gophers are now down another forward for the rest of the game.

 


   
FargoGopher7
(@fargogopher7)
Lucia Level Golden
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 48
Rep Pts: 98
 

Yikes that was a soft ass call


   
Boats reacted
GopherK2
(@gopherk2)
Lucia Level
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 39
Rep Pts: 139
 

Clymer is such a tool


   
Boats reacted
rowshkex
(@rowshkex)
Micheletti Level
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 201
Rep Pts: 656
Post on old board: 5728
 

If Michel's hit is a five minute penalty, Stramel needs five minutes and a GM for that too.


   
Boats reacted
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

HOW


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

These refs have made some interesting calls/non calls this period. 🤔 


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

That's as obvious a head hit as you can get. You can't cut across the front of the player and miss the shoulder and hit the head first.


   



Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @rowshkex

I'm sorry but if you skate with your head down and forward, it shouldn't be a penalty if someone hits you in the head.  You should have your head up all the time.

Um…what?

 


   
rowshkex
(@rowshkex)
Micheletti Level
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 201
Rep Pts: 656
Post on old board: 5728
 

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.


   
Boats reacted
gopherguy06
(@gopherguy06)
Wooger Level
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 391
Rep Pts: 447
Post on old board: 9527
 

Clearly a high stock to get the puck


   
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @j22

That's as obvious a head hit as you can get. You can't cut across the front of the player and miss the shoulder and hit the head first.

totally, lotta gopher colored glasses in here 

 


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085

   
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 


   
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

Should have never been called a goal on the ice. Terrible from referee


   
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

Michel gets a 5 minute major and a game misconduct. The Gophers are now down another forward for the rest of the game.

 

You would think when you only have 10 forwards that maybe you don’t risk getting booted on a worthless neutral zone check. 

 


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Ziemer hits the cross bar.


   
GopherK2
(@gopherk2)
Lucia Level
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 39
Rep Pts: 139
 

Down to 8 Forwards,  wow.  


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 

The high stick rule is based on the cross bar height (4 feet) not the shoulders of the player.

 


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

I'm not aware of any rule that should have made that a no-goal.


   



Idontknow
(@idontknow)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 707
Rep Pts: 1487
 

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @j22

That's as obvious a head hit as you can get. You can't cut across the front of the player and miss the shoulder and hit the head first.

totally, lotta gopher colored glasses in here 

 

I think you mean anthracite 

 


   
Bigbeer reacted
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600
 

Inexcusable penalty for the gophs to take there


   
Boats
(@boats)
Leopold Level
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 490
Rep Pts: 1600

   
J22 reacted
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 

The high stick rule is based on the cross bar height (4 feet) not the shoulders of the player.

 

Unless the puck goes into the net then its shoulder height, we went thru all this last year. Unless that dude was about 5’4” it was not played into the net with a high stick. They said it “came to rest” on top of the net which is apparently the rule. Never heard that but OK. 

 


   
GopherK2
(@gopherk2)
Lucia Level
Joined: 21 years ago
Posts: 39
Rep Pts: 139
 

Angry Face


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 

The high stick rule is based on the cross bar height (4 feet) not the shoulders of the player.

 

Shoulders

 


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

Posted by: @boats

Posted by: @j22

I'm not aware of any rule that should have made that a no-goal.

https://www.usahockeyrulebook.com/page/show/1084689-rule-631-puck-out-of-bounds-or-unplayable#:~:text=(b)%20Play%20shall%20be%20stopped,the%20puck%20within%20three%20seconds.

b

 

Pretty iffy, but I'll take it

 


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

The lack of consistency on calling/not calling interference when a forward chips the puck into the offensive zone and defensemen interferes/holding the forward gets on my nerves.

The refs didn't call it when the Michigan State defensemen did this to Ziemer early in the 2nd period but now it is called when Chelsey does it to a Michigan State forward and Sparty scores on a 4 on 3 power play to take the lead 3-2.

 

 


   
Bigbeer
(@bigbeer)
Brooks Level Golden
Joined: 19 years ago
Posts: 3210
Rep Pts: 6037
Post on old board: 9428
 

Was the unsportsmanlike penalty on Snuggs for embellishment? I mean, he took one to the chops. I guess he should have acted better… laid there for 30 seconds, got up slowly and slowly skated to the bench. Sounds like we need to practice getting cross checked in in the face more. 


   
Idontknow
(@idontknow)
Bonin Level Golden
Joined: 20 years ago
Posts: 707
Rep Pts: 1487
 

Posted by: @j22

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 

The high stick rule is based on the cross bar height (4 feet) not the shoulders of the player.

 

Shoulders

 

Looksike that's new for this year.

 


   
J22
 J22
(@j22)
Broten Level Golden
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1228
Rep Pts: 2948
Post on old board: 5631
 

Posted by: @idontknow

Posted by: @j22

Posted by: @collegehockeyaddict

Posted by: @bigbeer

Posted by: @rowshkex

The refs have no eyes.  Can they REALLY not see him grab the puck off the top of the net?  Seriously, this is ridiculous.

It was below his shoulder. They said it was waived off because the puck “came to rest” on top of the net. Sure OK I’ll take it. 

 

The high stick rule is based on the cross bar height (4 feet) not the shoulders of the player.

 

Shoulders

 

Looksike that's new for this year.

 

Yup. I was unaware until they started talking about it and I looked it up.

Also looked up the "puck unplayable" rule from above. It's not in the NCAA book. Im fairly certain that Sparty goal should've counted

 


   
College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

The Refs and Dylan aren't seeing eye to eye on hits tonight.

https://twitter.com/DylanLoucks4/status/1867745756503060879

https://twitter.com/DylanLoucks4/status/1867759015503044769


   



College Hockey Addict
(@collegehockeyaddict)
Mayasich Level
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4445
Rep Pts: 11085
 

Are the refs going to call this 5 minutes?

A cross check to Lamb's back from behind into the boards.


   
Gopherr16
(@gopherr16)
Rookie
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 49
Rep Pts: -116
 

2 things illegal the last few years:  

 

1.  Scoring on a breakaway or penalty shot.

 

2.  Stopping a breakaway 


   
Page 3 / 7

Registered/Logged In users will not see this ad